RE: [xliff-comment] Comment on XLIFF 2.0 30 day draft

From
Yves Savourel <>
Date
2013-05-30T19:24:37+00:00
ID
004301ce5d6b$51ec0830$f5c41890$@com
Thread
RE: [xliff-comment] Comment on XLIFF 2.0 30 day draft
> ... I would strongly urge the TC to pursue multiple independent 
> implementations of the format before finalizing the specification in
> order to flush out problems that are not immediately apparently 
> during the reading.

A big +1 on that sentiment.

I don't understand why OASIS has no requirement to have at least two implementations before a specification can move to standard,
like in the W3C.

-ys