Next in thread →
Next in month →
Re: [xliff-comment] XLIFF 1.2: semantics of value 0 in maxwidth attribute
Unfortunately, there seems to exist uncertainty about the semantics of value 0 in maxwidth attribute. I have seen/heard the following two interpretations: 1. maxwidth=”0” (size-unit=”char”): the translation may comprise an arbitrary number of characters (i.e. no length restriction exists) The specification does not indicate the use of the value. but from a number of tools I’ve used treat a ‘0’ maxwidth as ‘no limitation on width’. In my own opinion, a clean implementation of standard XLIFF 1.2 (whatever standard XLIFF actually is !!) would omit maxwidth in the case of the value being 0 to remove any ambiguity. 2. maxwidth=”0” (size-unit=”char”): the translation may not comprise any character (i.e. only an empty string is allowed) Would you mind commenting on the correct semantic/interpretation? The real issue here is that various tool implementations using XLIFF don’t make any statement on the treatment of these values. Best regards, Christian S t e p h e n H o l m e : stephen.holmescell: +353 86 7 944 955
Next in thread →
Next in month →