csprd02- Comments in the draft

There are quite a few (more than a dozen) embedded comments in this latest draft:

e.g: "COMMENT: MAKE CLEAR THAT THERE ARE TWO HANDLINGS, ONE IS NOT TO REPRESENT THE DATA CATEGORY, THE OTHER IS IN THE MODULE. THE
EXTRACTION IS FOR ITS PROCESSORS GENERATING XLIFF, THE DIRECT REPRESENTATION IS FOR XLIFF PROCESSORS."

Some, like the one above, seem to indicate that there are still relatively important parts of the text that needs to be
edited/added/etc.

I assume this means there will be a csprd03 regardless of the disposition of the comments for csprd02. Is that correct?

-ys