← Prev in month ← Prev in thread

XLIFF 2.1 spec: bad links

From
Mihai Nita <>
Date
2017-11-20T21:52:32+00:00
ID
CAK69zbnaC9dji_BAGkctvCRv=tGaWFi2uiKV3M1sQq-=
Thread
XLIFF 2.1 spec: bad links
There are two different pages that I can find for the XLIFF 2.1 spec:

A newer document here: http://docs.oasis-open.org/xliff/xliff-core/v2.1/xliff-core-v2.1.html
It is marked "12 October 2017" and the sub-title is "Candidate OASIS Standard 01"

And an older one t http://docs.oasis-open.org/xliff/xliff-core/v2.1/cs01/xliff-core-v2.1-cs01.html
Marked "23 August 2017" and the subtitle is "Committee Specification 01"

Looking at the newest one (xliff-core-v2.1.html) some of the links are wrong
(they point to older doc, instead of staying in the same doc)

For instance go to <source> (http://docs.oasis-open.org/xliff/xliff-core/v2.1/xliff-core-v2.1.html#source)
and click on any of the possible content tags.

 <sm> goes to http://docs.oasis-open.org/xliff/xliff-core/v2.1/cos01/xliff-core-v2.1-cos01.html#sm and so on.

v2.1/xliff-core-v2.1.html#sm, click on any attribute (e.g. type), it goes to 
/v2.1/cos01/xliff-core-v2.1-cos01.html#type

I might be some bad redirect though, because saving the file the href(s) point to local labels

(#em, #type and so)

Probably not a big deal, just confusing...

Thank you,
Mihai
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread