Having both attributes is not forbidden in the specification. It is even valid according to the core schema.
Perhaps the specification needs to be modified to make having both attributes present at the same time an invalid case.
Regards,
Rodolfo
--
Rodolfo M. Raya
Maxprograms https://www.maxprograms.com
From: David Filip <>
Date: Friday, April 5, 2019 at 12:01 PM
To: "Rodolfo M. Raya" <>
Cc: <>
Subject: Re: [xliff-comment] Comment annotations with "ref" and "value"
Hi Rodolfo,
having both is invalid.
Cheers dF
Dr. David Filip
===========
Convenor, JTC 1/SG 1 Open Source Software, Convenor, JTC 1/SC 42/WG 3 Trustworthiness of AI | National mirror chair, NSAI TC 02/SC 18 AI | Head of the Irish national delegation, ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 42 AI | Chair & Editor, OASIS XLIFF OMOS TC | Secretary & Lead Editor, OASIS XLIFF TC | NSAI expert to ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 38 Cloud Computing, ISO TC 37/SC 3 Terminology management, SC 4 Language resources, SC 5 Language technology
Moravia Research Fellow
ADAPT Centre
KDEG, Trinity College Dublin
Mobile: +420-777-218-122
On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 3:10 PM Rodolfo M. Raya <> wrote:
Hello,
Description of Comment Annotations at http://docs.oasis-open.org/xliff/xliff-core/v2.1/os/xliff-core-v2.1-os.html#commentAnnotation says that if âvalueâ is missing, there must be a ârefâ attribute pointing to a <note>.
What should be considered the text of the comment when both a âvalueâ and a valid ârefâ attribute exist?
Regards,
Rodolfo
--
Rodolfo M. Raya
Maxprograms https://www.maxprograms.com
