Personal Action Item to Review the existing Requirements

From
Yves Savourel
Date
2010-10-01T19:33:00+00:00
ID
Thread
Personal Action Item to Review the existing Requirements
Hi Christian, all,
> 1. I would tend to rephrase =20
> ...#1.5...
>
> From my understanding, the requirement is to associate meta
> data with the generic inline markup, not with a span.

What do you call "generic" inline markup? (the requirements do not include that word anywhere)

Mmm... To me this requirement simply says that the format should provide a way for a user agent to associate some meta data with a span of content. And that is that mechanism that would be the potential inline markup. (In "some " it's "text that is a term, not the tag "