RE: [xliff-inline] 1.3. Must be able to represent paired codes that have been separated

Hi Yves,

 I have no rationale to prefer one over the other to be named idref. It was an oversight - my fault for not taking the larger set of issues into account.

 I see "nid" referred to in 1.12.3.1. Is there something to do with the "n" in "nid" that makes it intuitive for its use? If not I would prefer it to be an idref as well.

 - Bryan