RE: [xliff-schemas] Minutes...

We can 
still proceed as we said and submit one proposal 
document.

If the 
main group wish to vote on each sum-item, I am happy to work that 
way.

 

Enda

  
-----Original Message-----
From: Lieske, Christian 
  [mailto:]
Sent: 01 March 2002 
  14:04
To: ''
Subject: 
  RE: [xliff-schemas] Minutes...

  
Hi 
  Enda,

  
 

  
I 
  share your interpretation of the minutes from the last TC (ie. 'the 
  main

  
TC 
  should decide'). The ambiguity from my point of view is the 
  phrase

  
'case by case basis'. My understanding was that our 
  subcommittee

  
should send out a document that contains all of the 
  enumeration-type

  
attribute values, and that the main TC should decide 
  for every attribute,

  
whose list of values currently consists of 
  'recommendations' should be

  
 

  
a) 
  closed

  
b) a 
  mixture of 'legal/recommanded' values and user-defined 
  values

  
c) 
  completely user-defined

  
 

  
Best, Christian

  
-----Original Message-----
From: Enda McDonnell 
  [mailto:]
Sent: Donnerstag, 28. Februar 
  2002 19:51
To: 
  ''
Subject: [xliff-schemas] 
  Minutes...

  

  
Hi 
  guys,

  
Minutes attached.  I will send these minutes 
  as-is to the main group.

  
Bye 
  the way, on re-reading the minutes from the last TC meeting, the following is 
  how the issue of suggesting lists to the main group was minuted on the 19th 
  Feb.  It is ambiguous, and I wasn't there to recall, but I read the 
  'whole group' here as the main TC group, am I wrong?  This is not 
  what we decided today.  

  
"The 
  issue of whether recommended lists should be open or close was raised.
It 
  was decided this should be decided on a case by case basis by the 
  whole
group. Eric will provide a list of these for 
  discussion."

  
Regards,

  
Enda