RE: [xliff] RE: [xliff-comment] Public Comment

From
Yves Savourel <>
Date
2004-05-19T16:31:06+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [xliff] RE: [xliff-comment] Public Comment
The fixed (and overdue) XSD addressing this issue should be posted sometime
today.

Thank again,
-yves

-----Original Message-----
From: 
[mailto:] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 10:27 AM
To: 
Cc: 
Subject: [xliff] RE: [xliff-comment] Public Comment

Yes, I agree with your solution.  This is the solution we came to in March.


http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/200403/msg00010.html

The second part is to remove the occurrence indicators of each child
element.  Thank you for your observation.

Bryan Schnabel

-----Original Message-----
From:  [mailto:]
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 8:40 AM
To: 
Subject: [xliff-comment] Public Comment


Comment from: 

Your XMLSchema for XLIFF is badly broken.  The 'ElemType_header'
complex-type has an xsd:choice grouping in it, containing 'glossary',
'reference', 'count-group', 'prop-group', and 'tool' elements.  A choice
group allows exactly 1 of the contained elements to appear, but your
standard clearly says that 0, 1 or more of these elements may appear.  You
need to add minOccurs="0" and maxOccurs="unbounded" as attributes to the
xsd:choice for XLIFF documents to validate correctly.

To unsubscribe from this list, send a post to
, or visit
http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/.

To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the
OASIS TC), go to
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xliff/members/leave_workgroup.p
hp.