Re: [xliff] Leave of absence request from XLIFF TC meetings

From
Dr. David Filip <>
Date
2015-10-05T16:50:37+00:00
ID
CANw5LK=vuV_CXO=e_E-6CzY7fJ=
Thread
Re: [xliff] Leave of absence request from XLIFF TC meetings
Ingo, all, Ingo is now on recorded as on LOA, so we have 1 voter less tomorrow but Ingo resumes his voting rights once back
Cheers

dF

On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 2:37 PM Dr. David Filip <> wrote:

Perfect, I'll make a note and start it as of 5th October
Cheers

dF

On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 2:03 PM Ingo Prause <> wrote:

Hi David,

 

I would like it to start on the 5th October 2015.

 

 

Thank you,

Ingo.

 

From:  [mailto:]
On Behalf Of Dr. David Filip

Sent: 16 September 2015 12:32

To: Ingo Prause; ; Bryan Schnabel; Dr. David Filip

Subject: Re: [xliff] Leave of absence request from XLIFF TC meetings

 

Thanks, Ingo, I will record this on kavi.

Please let me know the desired start date of your LOA. 

Please note that LOA automatically terminates as soon as you take part in a TC meeting or in a TC ballot, so it's usually best to start the LOA as late as possible, i.e. immediately preceding the first missed meeting.

Cheers dF

 

On Wed, Sep 16, 2015, 13:06 Ingo Prause <> wrote:

 

Hi,

 

I’ll be on holidays for the next 2 meetings, so I am requesting a leave of absence for this period.

 

Thank you,

Ingo.

 

 

From:
 [mailto:]
On Behalf Of Dr. David Filip

Sent: 15 September 2015 17:37

To: Yves Savourel

Cc: XLIFF Main List

Subject: Re: [xliff] One comment on 2.1 draft

 

Thanks, Yves, it's just a writing idiosyncrasy, your formulation makes much better sense, I will try and catch those for the next build hopefully before 6th October.

Cheers

dF

Dr. David Filip

=======================

OASIS XLIFF TC Secretary, Editor, and Liaison Officer 

LRC | CNGL | CSIS

University of Limerick, Ireland

telephone: +353-6120-2781

cellphone: +353-86-0222-158

facsimile: +353-6120-2734

http://www.cngl.ie/profile/?i=452

mailto: 

 

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 5:52 PM, Yves Savourel <> wrote:

Hi David, all,

Looking at the latest 2.1 draft here:

http://tools.oasis-open.org/version-control/browse/wsvn/xliff/trunk/xliff-21/xliff-core-v2.1.pdf

I noticed the phrase "...it MUST be anyway Extracted using..." is used in several places in the ITS section. I think it should be

"...it MUST be always represented using".

The rational:

- I think "anyway" is probably a typo.

- And using "Extracted" seems to assume using the ITS annotation is part of the extraction. But it's not: it can be done at any

time.

Cheers,

-yves

---------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that

generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:

https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

 

 

Click 
here to report this email as spam.

 

www.sdl.com 

 

 

SDL PLC confidential, all rights reserved. If you are not the intended recipient of this mail SDL requests and requires that you delete it without acting upon or copying any of its contents, and
 we further request that you advise us.

SDL PLC is a public limited company registered in England and Wales. Registered number: 02675207.

Registered address: Globe House, Clivemont Road, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 7DY, UK.

This message has been scanned for malware by Websense.
www.websense.com

 

www.sdl.com 

SDL PLC confidential, all rights reserved. If you are not the intended recipient of this mail SDL requests and requires that you delete it without acting upon or copying any of its contents,
 and we further request that you advise us.

SDL PLC is a public limited company registered in England and Wales. Registered number: 02675207.

Registered address: Globe House, Clivemont Road, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 7DY, UK.