On Monday 12 November 2001 07:08 pm, David Carlisle wrote:
> Whether any of the proposed solutions are too disruptive to be worth the
> benefits is a legitimate area of debate (and I'm not sure either way, to
> be honest) but you are aguing I think that there is no benefit at all
> which is where we disagree.
I'm more of the mind that standardization is not possible except for the
trivial cases, and even for that, we have to add kludges. I'd rather embrace
the fact that differences will exist, and make the best of it.
