RE: [xml-dev] There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone

From
Bullard, Claude L (Len) <>
To
'Jeff Lowery' <>, 'Gavin Thomas Nicol' <>,
Date
2002-01-23T22:47:55Z
ID
<2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E4306DF62E9@HQ5>
Thread
RE: [xml-dev] There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone
Ok, so let me muddy the waters again.  From the Free Online Dictionary of Computing

http://www.nightflight.com/foldoc-bin/foldoc.cgi?standards

"standard semantics

The standard interpretation of a term in some language yields the term's standard denotational semantics, i.e. its "meaning". This is usually given by a semantic function which maps a term in the abstract syntax to a point in some domain. The domain is the interpretation of the term's type. The semantic function also takes an environment - a function which maps the free variables of the term to their meaning. We say that a domain point "denotes", or "is the denotation of", a term. A non-standard semantics results from some other interpretation, e.g. an abstract interpretation."

len

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Lowery [mailto:]

I just read Pete's posting after writing up my own (cf. "A conceptual
excursion"). I sense a convergence of some sort occurring....

On xml-dev???!??!!!? Can't be.