← Prev in month ← Prev in thread

Re: [xml-dev] Re: AF and namespaces, once again (was Re: [xml-dev ] There is a m eaning, but it's not in the data alone)

From
Gavin Thomas Nicol <>
To
Date
2002-01-26T07:30:53Z
ID
<>
Thread
Re: [xml-dev] Re: AF and namespaces, once again (was Re: [xml-dev ] There is a m eaning, but it's not in the data alone)
On Friday 25 January 2002 03:22 pm, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> You go a bit further and require multiple semantics and that
> the instance should be able to tell the system which semantics
> it can be used with.

Some people would claim that this is what namespaces do.

I don't think the document is the place to specify the sets of 
applicable semantics.
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread