Next in thread → Next in month →

RE: [xml-dev] XMLSchema validation during an Update

From: Michael Brennan <>
To: 'Eric van der Vlist' <>,
Date: 2002-01-29T21:05:01Z
ID: <D7155AD41ECFD511AF4A00B0D0202CB51DFCBC@MAILHOST>
Thread: RE: [xml-dev] XMLSchema validation during an Update

> From: Eric van der Vlist [mailto:]

<snip/>

> BTW, I think we should find a new term to express the fact that a 
> vocabulary can or cannot be expressed by a W3C XML Schema.

How about calling such a vocabulary "relaxed"?  ;-)

← Prev in month ← Prev in thread

Next in thread → Next in month →