Nicolas LEHUEN wrote:
> Anyway, was does matters is that there is a great, great difference between
> a glorified editor with all the feature that you want (graphical editing,
> etc.) and an editor that may not have bell and whistles but which goes a
> step further by "understanding" the structure of your code, providing code
> completion.
I wonder what you think of Henry Thompson's XED, which enforces
well-structuredness at all times, but still presents a basically
text-editor view of the world.
I have often wished that it came with a "tidier" that would take
non-WF documents and force them to be WF to start with by completing
tags, even if incorrectly.
http://www.cogsci.ed.ac.uk/~ht/xed.html
It's free.
--
John Cowan <> http://www.reutershealth.com
I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen, http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith. --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_
