Re: [xml-dev] misprocessing namespaces (was Re: [xml-dev] There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone)

From
Mike Champion <>
To
The Deviants <>
Date
2002-01-30T17:52:07Z
ID
<NLV87ECHQ4Y1XRSQRPGCZXVPONDA.3c5832c7@MChamp>
Thread
Re: [xml-dev] misprocessing namespaces (was Re: [xml-dev] There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone)
1/30/2002 1:02:33 PM, "Simon St.Laurent" <> 
wrote:

>Weirder, actually. Like:
><test http://foo.com/bar/baz="value" />

What's weird about that (other than the http:// ...and all the 
baggage that drags along with it)?  I thought terseness was not a 
consideration for XML?  

There was a long, long sml-dev thread on this horrid subject, and the 
conclusion (as I recall) that simply putting the full domain 
qualifier in the markup vocabulary was the cleanest solution for 
everyone concerned (except the typist).