1/30/2002 7:58:48 PM, "Jonathan Borden" <> wrote:
>
>No seriously, the reason it doesn't matter is because XML Namespaces
are a
>done deal. All this discussion would have been fine when the rec was
under
>development,
I see some variant of Clean Namespaces as a potential usage guideline
for a set of users that don't need the power (and hassles) of W3C
Namespaces, not a counter-proposal to the standard. I personally
would disagree with using a ':' in a name except as a prefix
delimiter. As you say, that fails the IE5 test. Case closed.
> hardly anyone is working with DTDs?.
That is not my impression, FWIW. "Out of fashion at the W3C" is not
the same as "dead."
