Next in thread → Next in month →

Re: [xml-dev] Re: Flexible Schemas (was RE: [xml-dev] The task to be solved by RDDL)

From
Eric van der Vlist <>
To
Nicolas Lehuen <>
Date
2002-01-20T22:19:10Z
ID
<>
Thread
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Flexible Schemas (was RE: [xml-dev] The task to be solved by RDDL)
Nicolas Lehuen wrote:

> Why not use RDF instead ?


Because RDF is more intrusive than simple XLinks and can't be that 
easily embedded into XHTML documents.

When Jonathan Borden has announced RDDL a while ago, given his RDF 
background, I have been very surprised to see that he was not using RDF 
by XLink ;=) ...

And in any case, I am each day more convinced that the actual syntax is 
not what matters. RDDL is just a simple XSLT transformation away from 
its RDF counterpart!

Eric


> 
> Regards,
> Nicolas


-- 
Rendez-vous a Paris pour les Electronic Business Days 2002.
                                   http://www.edifrance.org/ebd/index.htm
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist       http://xmlfr.org            http://dyomedea.com
http://xsltunit.org      http://4xt.org           http://examplotron.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Next in thread → Next in month →