Re: [xml-dev] XML is easy, was: Re: SV: [xml-dev] XML=WAP? And DOA?

From
Jonathan Borden <>
To
Dare Obasanjo <>, Mike Champion <>,
Date
2002-01-18T23:45:09Z
ID
<02e601c1a07a$2a39a640$>
Thread
Re: [xml-dev] XML is easy, was: Re: SV: [xml-dev] XML=WAP? And DOA?
Dare Obasanjo wrote:

> I think "disaster" is a rather strong word. XHTML 1.1 is not even a year
old
> yet. I'd give it a few more months before complaining. No schema validator
> handles all of W3C XML schema yet (those that claim to are buggy as hell
or
> support a subset).

The XHTML 1.1 DTD conforms to XML 1.0, and validation has not changed since
XML 1.0 itself. This means that the W3C has produced a legal DTD that major
XML implementations are not capable of _parsing in validating mode_. I find
that surprising.

What does this say about conformance to XML 1.0 itself?

Jonathan