← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →

Re: [xml-dev] The task to be solved by RDDL. Re: [xml-dev] RDDL (was RE: [xml-dev] Negotiate Out The Noise)

From
Elliotte Rusty Harold <>
To
Date
2002-01-19T21:42:35Z
ID
<p04330101b86f98271497@[192.168.254.4]>
Thread
Re: [xml-dev] The task to be solved by RDDL. Re: [xml-dev] RDDL (was RE: [xml-dev] Negotiate Out The Noise)
At 4:56 PM -0800 1/18/02, Paul T wrote:


>What in particular happens in the situation when
>document has 2 namespaces mixed is unclear.
>Still.
>

I'm beginning to notice this as one of the fundamental confusions. 
There is no problem here. Each namespace has (or may have) its own 
RDDL document. A RDDL document describes a *namespace*. A RDDL 
document does not describe a *document*. There is not, nor was there 
ever intended to be, one canonical RDDL document for any given 
document.
-- 

+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
| Elliotte Rusty Harold |  | Writer/Programmer |
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
|          The XML Bible, 2nd Edition (Hungry Minds, 2001)           |
|              http://www.ibiblio.org/xml/books/bible2/              |
|   http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0764547607/cafeaulaitA/   |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
|  Read Cafe au Lait for Java News:  http://www.cafeaulait.org/      |
|  Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.ibiblio.org/xml/     |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →