Re: [xml-dev] XPointer crisis

At 11:59 AM 2/1/2002 -0500, David G. Durand wrote:
>If you read the archives, you may also be puzzled that the word within the 
>W3c seems to be that XPointer is dead, given the very small number of 
>negative comments submitted. [There's no denying that the one I found in 
>quick scan of the archives for the last 4 months was very negative]. 
>However, such issues are irrelevant at this point.

I just looked at the archives, and the very small number of comments of 
*any* kind is striking.

Jonathan