Re: [xml-dev] SAF anyone?

From: "Michael Brennan" <>
 
> My preference would be for a model that supports appinfo annotations
> directly within an XML Schema, analogous annotation constructs within RELAX
> NG schemas, or within rules in a Schematron schema (or something like it) to
> support the adornments approach. If that could be made to work, that seems
> like this would offer the greatest utility to developers.


There was some reason that we couldn't use SAF for Schematron embedded in
XML Schemas.  But certainly if your appinfo can use SAF, SAF looks like a good
convention to use.

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe