Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names was: Re: [xml-dev] "Abstract" URIs

From
Al Snell <>
To
The Deviants <>
Date
2002-02-14T09:49:32Z
ID
<>
Thread
Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names was: Re: [xml-dev] "Abstract" URIs
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, John Cowan wrote:

> That means that they are not equivalent in *convenience*.
> When I say they are equivalent in power, I mean it in the
> same sense that assembly language and Prolog are said to be equivalent
> in power: they are both Turing-complete.

Noooo! I knew it'd come to this.

ABS