RE: [xml-dev] Worse XML tools?

From
Bullard, Claude L (Len) <>
To
'Handoko' <>
Date
2002-02-22T14:06:52Z
ID
<2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E4306FEE8FD@HQ5>
Thread
RE: [xml-dev] Worse XML tools?
Yes.  Google probably uses most visited and most 
linked to.  It may also sell positions.  That exchange 
is satirical, not technical.

The best way to determine the quality of a 
tool is to use it in accordance with your requirements. 
Typically, I get best results by combining several 
tools and comparing.  When building XML Schemas, 
I found Spy to be good for large schemas, for the ODBC 
interface, and access to the datatypes.  I found I also 
needed tools like Topologi for quick and accurate 
validation of the XML Schema.  I don't particularly 
like grid editing interfaces but I don't have an 
alternative.

len

-----Original Message-----
From: Handoko [mailto:]

search: good+xml+tools also gave the same result.
So, that results just point something about xml tool.