RE: [xml-dev] Stupid Question (was RE: [xml-dev] XML doesn't dese rve its "X".)

From
Jeff Lowery <>
To
'Dare Obasanjo' <>,
Date
2002-03-07T18:32:43Z
ID
<>
Thread
RE: [xml-dev] Stupid Question (was RE: [xml-dev] XML doesn't dese rve its "X".)
> ... What I'd like to see are examples and design 
> patterns that show how subtitution groups and abstract types 
> can be used to build polymorphic apps that adapt well to 
> schema evolution. 

I think that's an excellent suggestion for an addition to the Best Practices
web site[1]. There's already some coverage there on Schema versioning
(thanks, Priscilla); Schema robusting(?) would go hand-in-hand with that. I
offer some thoughts on that subject in soon-to-be published book
<?whoTooted?>, but an open discussion of tried and true approaches would
certainly educate us all.

[1] http://www.xfront.com/BestPracticesHomepage.html
[2] http://www.manning.com/lowery/index.html