Re: [xml-dev] Stupid Question (was RE: [xml-dev] XML doesn't dese rve its "X".)

From
Thomas B. Passin <>
To
Date
2002-03-07T14:10:58Z
ID
<002501c1c5e1$e77fcb30$0bf13044@tbp>
Thread
Re: [xml-dev] Stupid Question (was RE: [xml-dev] XML doesn't dese rve its "X".)
[Nicolas LEHUEN]
...
Plus, of course, the child object can add a new method which gives access to
the new data model, and this method will be used by callers that rely on the
new schema.

That's why I believe OOP can provide useful insights in bringing the X to
XML.

[me]
No argument from me about this.  Remember, though, that we can remove
structures that are in ancestor types and elements when we derive new ones -
XML Schema supports doing so, for example  - which we can't with standard OO
methodologies.  In this way, XML markup can be considered richer than OO
modeling.

Cheers,

Tom P