> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Brennan [mailto:]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 3:16 PM
> To: 'Jonathan Robie';
> Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
>
>
> > From: Jonathan Robie [mailto:]
>
> <snip/>
>
> > Er, do they really call it a "reference implementation"?
>
> Er, no. But Dare's message "nominating" Microsoft's
> implementations as good examples of conforming processors
> somehow got transcribed in my mind into an offer nominating
> their implementations as reference implementations.
>
> Sorry. My mistake.
>
> It would still be terribly nice to see some release notes,
> though, explaining what's different between 4.0 SP1 and RTM.
> We've been burned by "bug fix" patches before. I'd like to
> know why we should upgrade.
>
I'm working on getting this out as soon as possible.
--
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
You assume all risk for your use. (c) 2001 Microsoft Corporation. All
rights reserved.
