I think "Schrodinger type" is a much better name than "Ur type".
The W3C should issue an addendum to rename it.
-Wayne Steele
>From: Jeff Lowery <>
>
>Meaning? You want meaning?
>
>As Dare assures me (and the rest of us ignorami who are not W3C members)
>Henry's got the technical issues regarding the Schrodinger type nailed down
>in his forthcoming erratum.
>
>As for purpose and intent, I assume it was done so that all types are based
>on a single root. Defining empty content this way is perfectly consistent
>with how restriction works, BTW.
>
>
_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
