Re: [xml-dev] MSXML DOM Special Chars Less Than 32

Michael Kay wrote:

> (Of course there are solutions like using processing instructions or
> quoted-printable encoding. But I haven't heard any good argument why I
> shouldn't be able to use XML character references to represent these
> characters, which would seem a much more natural approach. 


Er, I offered one, which I believe the next sentence is an attempt
to refute

> In any case, the
> semantics of BEL are at least as well-defined as TAB.)


EOT.  ETX.  QED.  -Tim