> 2) What is the status of Xerces support for RELAX NG? My friends in the
> trenches tell me that Xerces is widely seen as the de facto standard and
> that without said support, no schema language has much of a chance at
> widespread adoption.
RELAX NG does not require anything beyond what is provided by SAX and DOM,
and can be cleanly layered on top of the parser. Xerces (or rather
Xerces-J, which I assume is what you mean) supports SAX 2, and so works
just fine with both Jing and MSV. There would be no advantage in having
Xerces-specific RELAX NG support.
James
