Re: [xml-dev] RELAX NG Marketing

From
Thomas B. Passin <>
To
Date
2002-03-26T20:37:27Z
ID
<002101c1d506$0b74f960$0bf13044@tbp>
Thread
Re: [xml-dev] RELAX NG Marketing
[Jeff Lowery]

> Inelegant as appinfo cardinality annotations may be, I have suggested
three
> alternatives, none of which are being accepted with open arms:
>
> 1) add a constraint to the data model that requires children to be
ordered.
> (I have sympathy for those who wish not to enforce artificial constraints
on
> their data model.)
> 2) Use RELAX-NG + XSD datatypes. (Politically incorrect.)
> 3) Fix the cardinality definitions in the XSD schema and use an XSLT
> transform to order children prior to validation.  (Seems simplest, but
> what's the performance hit for a large document? Maybe Tom Passin can
answer
> that one.).
>

Aha, payback time, eh, Jeff?  The smallest performance hit would be to use
an xslt stylesheet to reorder the __schema__, not the data (after all, they
want to allow any order, right?)!

Cheers,

Tom P