Re: [xml-dev] RELAX NG Marketing (was RE: [xml-dev] Do Names Matter?)

From
Rick Jelliffe <>
To
Date
2002-03-27T11:09:08Z
ID
<026701c1d57f$d0c52b30$>
Thread
Re: [xml-dev] RELAX NG Marketing (was RE: [xml-dev] Do Names Matter?)
From: "James Clark" <>

> There would be no advantage in having Xerces-specific RELAX NG support.

I think Matthew means that Jing (or some other RELAX NG validator) should be 
contributed to Xerces with an XNI API so that everyone who uses Xerces gets it. 
I think that is an excellent idea.

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe