Re: [xml-dev] W3C Culture and Aims (Was: What does SOAP really ad

Matthew Gertner scripsit:

> I would have expected the
> W3C to take a more open stance and revise it if events prove this to be
> necessary (and I will give very attractive odds if someone wants to bet that
> this would be the case).

That is indeed (or so I believe) in progress, but the W3C is unwilling
to impose openness, *especially* retroactively, on its WGs.

-- 
John Cowan <>     http://www.reutershealth.com
I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen,    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith.  --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_