Next in thread → Next in month →

RE: RE: [xml-dev] Painful USA Today article (was RE: [xml-dev] AN N: RESTTutorial)

From
John Evdemon <>
To
Date
2002-05-22T18:39:50Z
ID
<3CEBADB6.18564.B4F2E5@localhost>
Thread
RE: RE: [xml-dev] Painful USA Today article (was RE: [xml-dev] AN N: RESTTutorial)
On 22 May 2002 at 14:26, Long, Craig Z wrote:

> 		Hey,  I'm coming in on the tail-end of this... point me to
> the article (USA Today) that is being discussed.


------- Forwarded message follows -------
From:           	John Evdemon <>
To:             	
Subject:        	RE: [xml-dev] ANN: REST Tutorial
Date sent:      	Tue, 21 May 2002 10:33:01 -0400

On 21 May 2002 at 9:11, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:

> Because anything truly new is also unrecognizable.  It 
> will sit on the shelf while the insanely restless play 
> with it and adapt it.  Over some period of time they 
> will get results that others will covet and emulate. 

Or blow the budget on something that may never gain acceptance.  This 

popped up this morning as a rather painful reminder of the trends and 

bandwagons the industry keeps jumping onto:

http://www.usatoday.com/money/general/2002/05/20/squander.htm

------- End of forwarded message -------
Next in thread → Next in month →