On 21 May 2002 at 17:30, Mike Champion wrote:
> Would anyone seriously argue that XML
> would be taken more seriously if RELAX NG and other challenges to
> the orthodoxy just went away?
Bits like RNG provide the insights and clarity needed to understand
the complexity of the orthodoxy.
> I suspect that the best way forward is
> to define what it is that we all agree works, refactor the specs
> to put all this at the core, experiment with various ways to built
> on top of the core, but freely admit that we're exploring
> multiple ideas about schemas, query languages, web services architectures,
> etc. and the *real* standards for these aren't baked yet.
Sounds interesting, but XML 1.0 is (imho) not among the TR's that
need refactoring.
