At 07:19 PM 5/6/2002 -0400, Simon St.Laurent wrote:
>Perhaps there is a reasonable ground for advancement in XPath without
>the train wreck of 2.0.
>
>My basic problem with XPath is 2.1.3: "XPath is a strongly typed
>language with a type system based on [XML Schema]."
Before we start a new activity, I would like to know very concretely what
bothers you, at the level that will face most users.
Can you show me some sample XML data and XPath expressions where you get a
result you do not like with XPath 2.0?
Jonathan
