David Carlisle wrote:
> As far as I can see it's going to be
> a real pain to write portable XSLT 2.0 stylesheets (unless we're
> provided with a switch to put in the stylesheet that says not to mess
> with a schema even if one is found for the document).
As Mike Kay has mentioned, there has been talk in the working group about
supporting a "schema-less" conformance level for XSLT 2.0, whatever that may
come to mean. Concrete suggestions such as this (parenthetical) one are just
what we need to determine the requirements for such a conformance level,
should we decide to pursue one. I personally encourage sending focused, well
thought out suggestions scoped to this particular issue, i.e. what do you
want in a "schema-less" conformance level for XSLT 2.0, to
Evan Lenz
(speaking for himself only, not on behalf of the XSL WG)
