Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions

From
Jonathan Robie <>
To
Mike Champion <>, xml-dev <>
Date
2002-05-13T18:18:32Z
ID
<>
Thread
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions
At 01:39 PM 5/13/2002 -0400, Mike Champion wrote:
>Michael Kay noted the other day that namespaces seemed like just
>as much of a nightmare in XSLT 1.0 as W3C Schema
>does now; people got used to namespaces, and are starting to get used to XSD,
>so maybe there is hope for the world after all.  Sure ... but I'd suggest that
>people like the idea of declaring their elements to be strings, integers,
>floating point numbers, dates,etc.; not very many people want to worry 
>about the
>distinctions between int,long, and short -- to say nothing of unsignedLong 
>and
>positiveInteger -- unless absolutely forced to.

If XML is used as a serialization format for languages that use numerics of 
fixed size, it is useful to know that you have an instance that will fit in 
one of these numeric types.

Jonathan