In <>, Joe English
<> wrote:
| It seems to me that a good strategy for infoset-augmenting processes
| would be to simply add attributes with a distinguished namespace.
There's a traditional precedent for this;-)
| This keeps things entirely within the XML 1.0 data model.
| For example, instead of adding a [type definition name] information
| set item to an element, it could add an "xs:type" attribute.
How different is this from a NOTATION, though?
| Those that need to augment attributes should really think twice
| about wanting to do that :-), but HyTime-style paired lists would
| work here.
Perhaps, except that paired lists can't be extracted without an extension
function. (One reason why I find XSLT disappointing.)
