Re: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?

>     I suspect many of the lurking XML-DEVers (and XSL-LISTers, for that
>     matter) are similarly in agreement with Jeni.  Silence doesn't
>     necessarily mean apathy: there's simply been no need to add anything
>     to what Jeni's said, other than a "me too" such as this.
>     (Hmmm: should I also post this to public-qt-comments?)

I'll support that, just to illustrate that Michael has a point. I agree
totally with Jeni's summary. Me too. No duplication of features /
tangling of flow control for me, thanks.

Christian Nentwich