Re: [xml-dev] Objections to / uses of PSVI?

> One specification, containing types for the document folks (ID,
> NMTOKEN), for the C-influenced folks (short, unsignedThisAndThat), for
> the database folks (gHorribleKludge).

You're exactly right!  That's the most concise problem definition I've 
seen.  Thanks.

 > Apart from XML, no language on
> earth can natively type this stuff.

One typesys to rule them, and in the darkness bind them.

	/r$