RE: [xml-dev] Objections to / uses of PSVI?

From
Bill de hÓra <>
To
'Mike Champion' <>, 'xml-dev' <>
Date
2002-05-15T15:32:21Z
ID
<006601c1fc25$b8ebb890$887ba8c0@mitchum>
Thread
RE: [xml-dev] Objections to / uses of PSVI?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Champion [mailto:] 
> Sent: 15 May 2002 14:26
> To: xml-dev
> Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Objections to / uses of PSVI?
> 
> 
> 5/15/2002 8:30:34 AM, Ronald Bourret <>
> wrote:  
> 
> >
> >Agreed, although I'm not convinced that means we should 
> throw out types 
> >altogether.
> 
> Nobody screamed when XPath added such universally understood 
> types as string, number, and boolean.  Few would object to 
> adding other universally understood types such as date, 

A date might be universally understood, but getting
calendaring/dates right in the details is hard work. I'd like to
see date typing in its own spec/annex.

Bill de hÓra

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 7.0.4

iQA/AwUBPOJnIeaWiFwg2CH4EQK7+ACg4Y169xbkGK13c7fMR8o0dsNZQBcAoKLC
xufD7Tho1mlSuC6c9mirIWlX
=9oOx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----