> Aaron:
> If HTTP is an application protocol, I don't see how SOAP
> can't be...
> Aaron:
> First, I personally don't refer to SOAP as an "application
> protocol" but rather as a "messaging framework".
?
> It's a fallacy of composition to draw the conclusion that an
> "application protocol" MUST have the characteristics you list
> above just because most of the commonly-thought-of
> application protocols share those characteristics.
No it's not. I'm still interested in how you can say "If HTTP is an
application protocol, I don't see how SOAP can't be". Did you imply a
messaging framework when you said application protocol?
Bill de hÓra
