Re: [xml-dev] Illegal Characters in Namespace URIs

On Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 08:48:11AM +0200, Julian Reschke wrote:
> Not so. The reason WebDAV "gets away" with the badly chosen namespace name is the fact that RFC2396+ is going to allow empty scheme-specific parts, making "just the scheme name" a valid URI. At least that's my understanding of the outcome of the discussion.

"RFC 2396+" is likely going to allow empty scheme-specific parts
*because* WebDAV made a boo-boo, not the other way around. 8-)

MB
-- 
Mark Baker, CTO, Idokorro Mobile (formerly Planetfred)
Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.               
http://www.markbaker.ca        http://www.idokorro.com