Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML

From
Rob Lugt <>
To
"Thomas B. Passin" <>,
Date
2002-06-24T08:58:55Z
ID
<130601c21b5d$5ef75090$0400a8c0@scott>
Thread
Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML
Thomas B. Passin wrote
> Plus, xhtml with short tags wouldn't work in standard browsers.

Are you suggesting that standard browser compatibility is a reasonable
criteria for judging future modifications to XML?  If so, I wonder how XML
1.1 [1] will fair.

Regards
~Rob

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xml11/