At 04:26 PM 7/8/2002 -0400, Simon St.Laurent wrote:
>At 04:20 PM 7/8/2002 -0400, Jonathan Robie wrote:
>>On the other hand, if you are satisfied with understanding only simple
>>types, you could try the simplest conformant subset of XQuery.
>
>I'd prefer that, but I'd prefer not to have to dumpster-dive through the
>rest of the specification to find it. That "simplest conformant subset"
>is not an obvious spec.
Then you might want to wait for the tutorials to emerge, or work your way
through the use cases. One good way to visualize this simplest conformant
subset is to look at the examples in the use cases and in the XQuery
specification itself - relatively few of these examples actually use
complex types.
Jonathan
