What would be the impact on RDF if it used these
instead of URIs?
Honest question because I don't use RDF but note
that the current controversy started there.
I loved the message in your sig. It speaks
to the "politics of meaning".
len
From: John Cowan [mailto:]
"Bullard, Claude L (Len)" scripsit:
> I also believe in markup Off The Web. That is
> one reason I like to keep Public IDs as an
> option. Call them URNs if you like.
I do like, and consequently there is a mapping from
Public IDs to a subset of URNs (those which begin
"urn:publicid:").
