>
> > Why not try that minimal solution first, and see if it works?
> >
> > (And why not do it as a corrigendum rather than 1.1)
>
> I keep telling you why. Because it changes the definition of
> well-formedness. A document like "<foo<NEL>bar=baz> is not WF
> XML 1.0, but it is WF XML 1.1.
>
You could do it without changing the definition of well-formedness by
saying that the set of characters considered to be whitespace, and
normalized as such, is a property of the encoding.
Michael Kay
Software AG
home:
work:
