Hi Tim,
On Tue, 2002-08-20 at 20:13, Tim Bray wrote:
> Simon St.Laurent wrote:
>
> > This parser is _not_ XML 1.0-compliant, ...
> Hehe. Sounds like an XML-SW parser to me. -Tim
But, shouldn't we be really nervous about things that have XML in their
name but don't enforce well-formedness ? :-)))
TAM is a careful name indeed!
Eric
--
Rendez-vous à Paris.
http://www.technoforum.fr/integ2002/index.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com
(W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema
------------------------------------------------------------------------
