Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20)

From
Lars Marius Garshol <>
To
Date
2002-08-19T21:57:12Z
ID
<>
Thread
Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20)
* Simon St Laurent
| 
| I worry about RDF (and URIs generally) poisoning XML, 

How would it do that? As far as I can tell the two are entirely
separate, except that one of the RDF syntaxes is based on XML.

| [...] So far, I think XHTML has chosen carefully and avoided the
| really toxic bits.

Quite possibly. Personally, I would have been happier if they had not
only changed frames, but also fixed the most broken aspects of them.
Pages should ask to be wrapped in framesets, not the other way around.

-- 
Lars Marius Garshol, Ontopian         <URL: http://www.ontopia.net >
ISO SC34/WG3, OASIS GeoLang TC        <URL: http://www.garshol.priv.no >